سԹ

Beyond the Bid: How Butler Cohen Delivers Solutions, Improves Outcomes and Transforms School Projects Through Design-Bid-Build

Butler Cohen served as Construction Manager at-Risk to construct a new ground-up K-8 campus for charter school operator Academica in Austin, Texas.
Butler Cohen served as Construction Manager at-Risk to construct a new ground-up K-8 campus for charter school operator Academica in Austin, Texas. | Photo Credit (all): Courtesy of Butler Cohen

ByJason Permenter

Design-Bid-Build, commonly referred to in the construction industry as a “hard bid” project, refers to the construction delivery method commonlyutilizedbyschooldistricts and other education providers, in which the design team is hired directly theowner.

The commonperceptionis that once this delivery methodis chosen,that’sit.Theproject’s fate is sealed, andonce design and bidding are complete,theowner isstuck with the bids they receive, irrespective of their project budget,andwith a limited ability at that point to cut costoverruns or meet aggressive schedule expectations. However,for owners that have alreadychosen this delivery method foraproject,all is not lost.Thecarefulselectionof ageneralcontractorthatwillwork collaborativelywith theowner and designteam can help rescue the project,deliveringeffective solutions to improvebudget and scheduleoutcomes.

The primary challenge with a hard-bid project is that the bid only applies to exactly what is included in the plans and specifications.
The primary challenge with a hard-bid project is that the bid only applies to exactly what is included in the plans and specifications.

Understanding theDesign-Bid-Bid Process

Owners commonly choose the Design-Bid-Build process fora number ofreasons.The attractiveness of competitive pricing isperhaps thebiggest driver, along with aperceptionof budget certainty;or,maybe thatis simply howa schooldistrict or education provider has always done things.

In the Design-Bid-Buildprocess, the design team, typically consisting of aleadarchitect and a team of design consultants and engineers,works with theowner toprogram anddevelop a detailed set of plans and specifications for the project through a series of design phases. Typical phases include programming, schematic design, design development,and finally,construction documents.

Upon completionof detailed design, thearchitect orowner’srepresentative willsolicitcompetitive sealed proposals fromgeneralcontractorsleading to “hard bid”lump-sumresponses fromgeneralcontractors. These responses are typically ranked by fee,with the qualified bidderthatsubmitsthe lowest numberwinning the project.The process seems simple enough, but there area number ofchallenges and pitfalls for the savvyowner to be aware of.

Common Challenges with Hard-Bid Projects

The primary challenge with a hard-bid projectis that the bid only applies to exactly what is included in the plans and specifications. Items not captured can include scope gaps or missing scope, unforeseen conditionsoradditionalscope not captured in the original design.These items will lead to the dreadedchangeorder,typically increasing the total contract.Thiscan create anadversarialrelationshipbetweentheowner,architect, andcontractor,andalsocreate risk for significantscheduledelay and cost overrun.

Compounding this challenge,owners may find that, once all bids are received, they are already significantly beyond the planned project budget.At this stage, they may feel like there is limited ability to get the project back on budget now that they are “locked in” to a completed set of plans theycan’tafford.

Owners may also have concerns withquality, safety, and financial capabilityof a “low-bid”contractor,which may addadditionalrisk to the projectthey are uncomfortable with.

HowButler CohenResolves Hard Bid Challenges/Value Engineering

As a Texas-basedgeneralcontractor,Butler Cohenfaces this challengefrequently:thefirm hasbeen awarded the project, buttheowner’sbudgetis significantly below our winning bid. Due to our firm’s deep experiencewith alternative delivery methods,including Design-Build, weare able torapidlyintegrate ourpreconstruction teamand other in-house resourcesinto the existing project team,establishingopen lines of communication between theowner,architectandcontractor.

Weutilizeproactive problem-solving and change management strategies,leveragingourexpertisein value engineering and cost controlto trim the fat while still delivering a high-quality and functional facility that meets theowner’s project vision.At the same time, weexerciseoursubcontractor network toidentifypotential cost savings strategiesand alternatives.

Read the full article, including a case study on successful intervention for private school expansion, in the .

Jason Permenter is Pre-Development Manager for Butler Cohen.

Share this article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *